Answer recommended by Intel
More Related Contents:
- Why does C++ code for testing the Collatz conjecture run faster than hand-written assembly?
- Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?
- What C/C++ compiler can use push pop instructions for creating local variables, instead of just increasing esp once?
- Why is std::fill(0) slower than std::fill(1)?
- What are these seemingly-useless callq instructions in my x86 object files for?
- Why is this SIMD multiplication not faster than non-SIMD multiplication?
- Is < faster than
- Can modern x86 hardware not store a single byte to memory?
- What is IACA and how do I use it?
- Why does this function push RAX to the stack as the first operation?
- Is it safe to read past the end of a buffer within the same page on x86 and x64?
- How do objects work in x86 at the assembly level?
- Loop with function call faster than an empty loop
- How do I call “cpuid” in Linux?
- Is inline assembly language slower than native C++ code?
- What does the “lock” instruction mean in x86 assembly?
- Is using double faster than float?
- Difference in performance between MSVC and GCC for highly optimized matrix multplication code
- Atomic operations, std::atomic and ordering of writes
- Trial-division code runs 2x faster as 32-bit on Windows than 64-bit on Linux
- Why does GCC generate 15-20% faster code if I optimize for size instead of speed?
- Why does a std::atomic store with sequential consistency use XCHG?
- Assembly ADC (Add with carry) to C++
- Difference between rdtscp, rdtsc : memory and cpuid / rdtsc?
- x86 MUL Instruction from VS 2008/2010
- Using bts assembly instruction with gcc compiler
- Address of function is not actual code address
- Why do I see 400x outlier timings when calling clock_gettime repeatedly?
- Why is this C++ wrapper class not being inlined away?
- Fastest inline-assembly spinlock