Why in x86-64 the virtual address are 4 bits shorter than physical (48 bits vs. 52 long)?

by

More Related Contents:

  1. x86-64 canonical address?
  2. Why use RIP-relative addressing in NASM?
  3. Why do x86-64 instructions on 32-bit registers zero the upper part of the full 64-bit register?
  4. Why doesn’t GCC use partial registers?
  5. Difference between movq and movabsq in x86-64
  6. rbp not allowed as SIB base?
  7. CS:APP example uses idivq with two operands?
  8. why we can’t move a 64-bit immediate value to memory?
  9. Set all bits in CPU register to 1 efficiently
  10. Why is imul used for multiplying unsigned numbers?
  11. Why can’t I move directly a byte to a 64 bit register?
  12. What does “DS:[40207A]” mean in assembly?
  13. Why does the x86-64 GCC function prologue allocate less stack than the local variables?
  14. Bomb lab phase_4
  15. x86_64 registers rax/eax/ax/al overwriting full register contents [duplicate]
  16. Does it make any sense to use the LFENCE instruction on x86/x86_64 processors?
  17. Why not store function parameters in XMM vector registers?
  18. Segmentation fault when using DB (define byte) inside a function
  19. How to use RIP Relative Addressing in a 64-bit assembly program?
  20. What does an asterisk * before an address mean in x86-64 AT&T assembly?
  21. When should I use size directives in x86?
  22. Understanding %rip register in intel assembly
  23. Using 8-bit registers in x86-64 indexed addressing modes
  24. Why can I access lower dword/word/byte in a register but not higher?
  25. What’s the best way to remember the x86-64 System V arg register order?
  26. rsp doesn’t move when entering new function [duplicate]
  27. What is callq instruction?
  28. Can rip be used with another register with RIP-relative addressing?
  29. Create an arg array for execve on the stack
  30. x86 Assembly pushl/popl don’t work with “Error: suffix or operands invalid”

Leave a Comment