Answer recommended by Intel
More Related Contents:
- The advantages of using 32bit registers/instructions in x86-64
- what does “mov offset(%rip), %rax” do?
- What does an asterisk * before an address mean in x86-64 AT&T assembly?
- Why does the x86-64 System V calling convention pass args in registers instead of just the stack?
- Understanding GCC’s floating point constants in assembly listing output
- Why did GCC generate mov %eax,%eax and what does it mean?
- clang (LLVM) inline assembly – multiple constraints with useless spills / reloads
- x86_64: Is it possible to “in-line substitute” PLT/GOT references?
- what is the order of source operands in AT&T syntax compared to Intel syntax?
- Why doesn’t GCC optimize a*a*a*a*a*a to (a*a*a)*(a*a*a)?
- Why does GCC use multiplication by a strange number in implementing integer division?
- Difference between movq and movabsq in x86-64
- How do RIP-relative variable references like “[RIP + _a]” in x86-64 GAS Intel-syntax work?
- rbp not allowed as SIB base?
- Why does GCC allocate more space than necessary on the stack, beyond what’s needed for alignment?
- Vectorizing with unaligned buffers: using VMASKMOVPS: generating a mask from a misalignment count? Or not using that insn at all
- Why is %eax zeroed before a call to printf?
- Calling printf in x86_64 using GNU assembler
- Prefetching Examples?
- Unable to move variables in .data to registers with Mac x86 Assembly
- How does “mov (%ebx,%eax,4),%eax” work? [duplicate]
- Number of executed Instructions different for Hello World program Nasm Assembly and C
- Does a compiler always produce an assembly code?
- How to set gcc or clang to use Intel syntax permanently for inline asm() statements?
- x86_64 : is stack frame pointer almost useless?
- Linux process stack overrun by local variables (stack guarding)
- Understanding %rip register in intel assembly
- What is callq instruction?
- x64 nasm: pushing memory addresses onto the stack & call function
- Can rip be used with another register with RIP-relative addressing?