More Related Contents:
- Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviations with _mm_popcnt_u64 on Intel CPUs
- What are these seemingly-useless callq instructions in my x86 object files for?
- How to remove “noise” from GCC/clang assembly output?
- Why does C++ code for testing the Collatz conjecture run faster than hand-written assembly?
- Can x86’s MOV really be “free”? Why can’t I reproduce this at all?
- Why does mulss take only 3 cycles on Haswell, different from Agner’s instruction tables? (Unrolling FP loops with multiple accumulators)
- Why are elementwise additions much faster in separate loops than in a combined loop?
- Can modern x86 hardware not store a single byte to memory?
- Why does this function push RAX to the stack as the first operation?
- Is it possible to tell the branch predictor how likely it is to follow the branch?
- How do objects work in x86 at the assembly level?
- How do I call “cpuid” in Linux?
- What does the “lock” instruction mean in x86 assembly?
- Difference in performance between MSVC and GCC for highly optimized matrix multplication code
- Atomic operations, std::atomic and ordering of writes
- Why does a std::atomic store with sequential consistency use XCHG?
- How to generate assembly code with clang in Intel syntax?
- Why is std::fill(0) slower than std::fill(1)?
- Assembly ADC (Add with carry) to C++
- x86 MUL Instruction from VS 2008/2010
- Address of function is not actual code address
- Why is gcc allowed to speculatively load from a struct?
- Why is this SIMD multiplication not faster than non-SIMD multiplication?
- How to force GCC to assume that a floating-point expression is non-negative?
- Fastest inline-assembly spinlock
- Using base pointer register in C++ inline asm
- Atomic double floating point or SSE/AVX vector load/store on x86_64
- Unoptimized clang++ code generates unneeded “movl $0, -4(%rbp)” in a trivial main()
- Why GCC compiled C program needs .eh_frame section?
- Compiler changes printf to puts